Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 27.06.2025 09:09

Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
What’s next?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Why does an older married man turn bisexual?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
6 Ways You Can Control Microplastics From Getting Into Your Food - HuffPost
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Abby Lee Miller Sues Cedars-Sinai Hospital, Claims Doctors Left Catheter in Her Body - TMZ
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Scientists Unveil a Method to Give Every Human the Ability to See in the Dark - The Daily Galaxy
Thank you.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.